SECTION II - Evaluation for Continued Accreditation The General Institutional Requirements
A complete description of how UW-River Falls meets the GIRs is contained in pages 159-168 of the Self-Study Report. Appropriate documents were available to the Team prior to and/or during the visit to confirm statements. The Team is confident that UW-River Falls meets the GIRs.

The Criteria for Accreditation
UW-River Falls' Self-Study Report documents patterns of evidence which, they believe, show that their University meets each of the five Criteria for Accreditation. The Report articulates their case sufficiently and effectively. After evaluation of the Report and conducting the visit, the members of the Team were unanimous in their view that UW-River Falls does meet the five criteria.
What follows is a summarization of selected evidence, and observations, many evaluative and some critical, which are intended to reinforce good practice, affirm good performance, and/or stimulate further self-analysis and change. It is through these comments that the Team and the NCA become a partner in the continuous efforts toward self-improvement at UW-River Falls.

Criterion One - The institution has clear and publicly stated purposes consistent with its mission and appropriate to an institution of higher education.
The University of Wisconsin-River Falls operates under three mission statements, all of which receive careful review and are approved by the University of Wisconsin -Board of Regents. These missions include one for the UW system, a second for the comprehensive institutions like UW-River Falls within the system, and finally the UW-River Falls Select Mission. The mission statements reflect a commitment to excellence in education and freedom of inquiry. All three mission statements are included in appropriate UW-River Falls publications.
Evidence suggests that UW-River Falls constituents fully understand the mission and have appropriate mechanisms in place to evaluate institutional goals. For example, the mission and accompanying goals served as the foundation of the Reach for the Future strategic planning process. The broad-based involvement of all stakeholders in this planning effort and the resulting strategic goals provide good evidence that UW-River Falls has an understanding of mission and purposes. The relationship of academic departments to the university mission is further articulated and strengthened as departments, through the Academic Planning and Outcomes Review (APOR) process, provide annual reports of activities in conjunction with departmental missions and goals.
While non-academic units have not participated as much in a comparable planning and outcomes review process, they have been engaged in the strategic planning process. A non-academic process similar to APOR is being developed. It promises to provide additional opportunities for systematic review of the goals. Nonetheless, non-academic units appear to have a clear understanding of institutional mission and the roles they play in support of that mission.

The team finds that UW-River Falls meets Criterion One.

Criterion 2